daidala: words on letters

about
contact
colophon

in dribs and drabs
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002

type types, mostly
Aimee Bender
Dyana Weissman
Mike Abbink
Jonathan Hoefler
Sebastian Lester
Jessica Helfand
Evert Bloemsma
Eric Olson

twenty (almost) more
01 Angie
02 Pastonchi
03 Ehrhardt
04 Avenir
05 Mendoza
06 Celeste
07 Syntax
08 Mrs Eaves
09 Meta
10 Eureka
11 TheMix
12 Loire
13 Columbus
14 Apollo
15 Super Grotesk
16 ITC Bodoni

great faces
Kievit
Requiem
Scene
Avance
Scala/Seria
Pastonchi ff
LT/MT Sabon
Aetna

litterae recentiores
prologue
the conference
pas de blog
font recommendations
junk english
psychic squabble
exceptions
confession...
three canonical responses...
well, what do you talk about?
alpha to omega
interesting?
homage...

texnically
tex ramblings...
slightly more concrete
from tex to typography
alcuin and euler

© Jon Coltz, 2003

ff super grotesk: 15 of 20

An exchange between a colleague and me yesterday morning:

— I was at Barnes and Noble last night and I thought of you. I saw a kickass book on fonts.

— Oh really? Do you remember what it was called?

— Uh, it was big and blue and had “typography” in large, white letters on the side.

— Ah, yes. That book is called Typography, and it is kickass indeed.

And then I made a mental note: Please, Self, you really must reincorporate “kickass” into your vocabulary, for your use of it fell to the wayside right about the time you began to lose interest in Molly Hatchet, Def Leppard, and Loverboy, and your conversations these twenty years have no doubt suffered owing to the lack of it.

So last night, when I arrived home from work, I opened up that kickass, trilingual, ten-pounder, and the first figures on which I lay my eyes were captioned Drescher, 1936–39, Arabella; Drescher, 1956, Antiqua 505 Bold.

I attempted to decipher the text at the top of the page: no, no, German. To the left: Hmmm, French. At the bottom: Ah, there we are. I’ll get this damn book figured out yet! Then, I scanned the bio: Arno Drescher, 1882 to 1971 – I should live so long. Taught at yadda, yadda, et cetera. Fonts: Arabella and Antiqua 505, just like the examples. But wait – he’s the original Super Grotesk guy, and there’s no mention of it here. To the fontfont.com info panel I went.

Now I am, generally, a rather even-tempered person, but a nice, ol’ geometric sans-serif can make me rather giddy and not even a little insane. House Industries’ Catalog No. 31 – yeah, the Neutraface one – well, I slept next to it for a month. This unhealthy behavior had its precedent formed when the FontFont folks sent me a little brochure nearly four years ago. It featured, among a few other new faces, FF Super Grotesk by eBoy’s Svend Smital, and at the time, this font was an answer to my prayers.

I longed for a Futura with a little flair and flourish, and Smital’s resurrection of Super Grotesk provided exactly that. It boasts more than a smattering of standard and unusual upper- and lowercase ligatures; it contains a nicely drawn set of text numerals; and it includes a less geometric, alternate a and g. Here’s a sample.

Drescher’s association with Super Grotesk strengthened in 2001 when Bitstream released Drescher Grotesk BT, by Nicolai Gogoll. It lacks the bells and whistles of Smital’s design but is available in twice as many weights as well as a cut with an enlarged x-height.

With such splendid variants on the canonical form as FontShop’s and Bitstream’s interpretations of Drescher’s Super Grotesk, DTL’s and Font Bureau’s (recently expanded) cuts of Nobel, and now House Industries’ Neutraface, not to mention The Foundry’s digitized archetype itself, it is truly a – what’s the word – oh yes, a kickass time to be a geosans lover.

22-March 2003

high point of the day

Compose, check, check again and once more, close eyes and pray, and then hit “send.” Kaboom!

(Stagehand cues Alamogordo test film.)

Broadcast email: Such raw, awesome power; such reach, such breadth. A chorus of dings and clicks; chairs swivel and eyes train. Read receipts flicker up the screen like ocean over the bow of the Titanic, and replies constitute second, third, and fourth waves, battering, and ultimately puncturing, my hull.

“I look forward to your training course.”
“I will be out of town that week. Could you offer your course on another date?”
“I do not have time to attend. Could you just send the PowerPoint deck?”

(Exit protagonist. Fade to black.)

17-March 2003

psychic squabble

Ego: ...you know, Indie Fonts – it’s that book featuring the work of independent type foundries. I simply haven’t had the time to scrutinize it like I should. Do you two think you’re up to the task? Now as usual, I’m taking the weekend off. Let’s see what kind of progress you can make by Monday morning...

Id: Independent? Foundry...? Ha! Two great big anachronisms, where type is concerned. Nobody’s independent anymore, and foundries no longer exist. And to feature the work of these so-called independent foundries in a book? Catalogued schmaltz, I say!

Superego: Guided by instinct, as usual, Id. Please explain yourself.

Id: Let’s begin with independent, shall we? Well, everybody and his dog is selling their wares on possessiveadjectivefonts.com or is hooked in through the Creative Whatever, which in turn is arm in arm with the granddaddy of them all. (Singing: Do you know the way to San Jose...?) Besides, you do know that independent is just a euphemism for small, don’t you? That’s right, in this context, independent simply implies secretly wishing one’s enterprise were bigger. Independent – such a noble thing to be in these organic-eatin’, hybrid-drivin’, tree-huggin’ times of ours. And foundry! Sheesh, foundry harkens back to the days of punchcutters and matrices and casters and such. Making type these days means a couple of kids sittin’ around in their underwear playing connect the dots with Bézier curves. And a book to show these types in? Have these Indie people ever heard of the Internet?

Superego: Completely irrational, and not funny in the least. Let me cross-examine you; where were you last Friday afternoon?

Id: Huh? Whaddya mean?

Superego: Were you not along for the ride with Our Master?

Id: Hey, I’m predestined to be unconscious most of the time and you know it. Not fair!

Superego: Let me refresh your apparently nonexistent memory. Master drove over to the Chank Company to pick up the Indie Fonts book. The company is headquartered in the beautiful, old California building in Northeast Minneapolis – a converted warehouse – not in some shiny, sterile office complex in the suburbs. This is independent. Master was then greeted by Chank himself, book in hand, and the two of them had a dandy chat over large lattes. When was the last time John Warnock met Master for coffee and handed over a book? This is what it means to be independent. Chank then proceeded to show Master some of his fonts in said book, fonts whose development and production were dictated neither by the whim of the disinterested wealthy who sit on corporate boards nor by the rising and falling fractions of a share price, but rather, by personal interest and passion. This epitomizes independence! And as for type foundry, did you bother to check the glossary in the back of the Indie Fonts book? No, because you’re illiterate and entirely preoccupied with carnal desire. It says, “Literally, a place for the manufacture of type...in modern terminology, a designer or company that creates and/or distributes digital typefaces may...be called a type foundry.” To your penultimate point, we have no evidence whatsoever that Gutenberg did not set the 42 line bible in his underwear. (You had to mention underwear, didn’t you.) Besides, I don’t care whether Chank drew Chunder in his underwear or Matthew designed Miller completely naked! You’re obsessing on nomenclature and missing the point as a result. Finally, to address your tired, old, screen vs. print argument, try as you might to keep up with the happenings of independent foundries and to stay abreast of their new releases, not to mention marking the appearance of new foundries themselves – well, it’s an undeniably Sisyphean task. Not all independent foundries have websites, and those that do are largely limited to displaying their typefaces as GIF images. Are you really fully satisfied by a collection of GIFs?

Id: Me? I’m never satisfied! Heh heh...

Superego: Get serious! People who use type print. And people who consider purchasing a typeface will scrutinize a sample – far preferably a printed one – before spending the money. There simply is no substitute for high-resolution, printed output. You’ve taken a look at the book; honestly, did you ever see the faces of LettError, Psy/Ops, and Test Pilot Collective look so good?

Id: Um, no. But...

Superego: But nothing! The work of independent type foundries needs and deserves to be celebrated, collected, and catalogued for the simple reason that it is done in a spirit of independence – free from all the constraints that corporations and their trappings can impose. Look around you – type is everywhere. On everything from street signs to cereal boxes, from storefronts to solicitations. And much of the best of that type was produced by independent foundries.

Id: Alright, alright, you’ve convinced me. Shiny gold star for you. But we’ve still got a book to read.

Superego: Indeed we do – let’s get on with it! Now, what did Master say? Oh yes, “Let’s see what kind of progress you can make by Monday morning...”

13-March 2003

« February